<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Past Cutters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laesser.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laesser.org</link>
	<description>of the USRCS, USLHS, &#38; USCG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mellon CO relieved of command</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/mellon-co-relieved-of-command/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/mellon-co-relieved-of-command/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALAMEDA, Calif. – The Coast Guard permanently relieved Capt. Daniel McLaughlin, commanding officer of Coast Guard Cutter Mellon, Dec. 21, 2012 due to loss of confidence in his ability to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALAMEDA, Calif. – The Coast Guard permanently relieved Capt. Daniel McLaughlin, commanding officer of Coast Guard Cutter Mellon, Dec. 21, 2012 due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.</p>
<p>Capt. Matthew Bliven has assumed temporary command of Mellon, and McLaughlin has been reassigned to Coast Guard 13<sup>th</sup>District Headquarters in Seattle.</p>
<p>Mellon, homeported in Seattle, is a 378-foot Hamilton class High-Endurance cutter commissioned in January of 1968.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/mellon-co-relieved-of-command/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Etheridge</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/813/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/813/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a warm December day, in Manteo, N.C., on Roanoke Island, the men and women of the Coast Guard Cutter Richard Etheridge stepped onto historic grounds. The Coast Guard men]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Coast Guard Cutter Richard Etheridge 600x400" src="http://images.military.com/media/news/equipment/121912-coast-guard-cutter-r-ts300.jpg" alt="Coast Guard Cutter Richard Etheridge 600x400" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<div>
<p>On a warm December day, in Manteo, N.C., on Roanoke Island, the men and women of the Coast Guard Cutter Richard Etheridge stepped onto historic grounds.</p>
<p>The Coast Guard men and women are greeted with smiles from a welcoming small crowd, many who represent families who have lived on the island since colonial times.</p>
<p>The crew, led by Cmdr. Christian Lee the commanding officer of the Coast Guard Cutter Richard Etheridge, came to learn about a man.  A man who started life as a slave, fought as a soldier, lived as a freeman, served as a sailor and later became a hero.  This Coast Guard hero is Richard Etheridge, keeper of Pea Island Lifesaving Station.</p>
<p>“The whole Outer Banks and the Coast Guard have such a connection because of the establishment of those early life saving stations in 1874,” said John Wilson, former mayor of Manteo.  “It has been a long close history between the Outer Bankers and the Coast Guard.”</p>
<p><a href="http://laesser.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Richard_Etheridge_12_Web.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-817" title="Richard_Etheridge_12_Web" src="http://laesser.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Richard_Etheridge_12_Web.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /></a>“Richard Etheridge, our namesake, most famously is the first African American to command a lifesaving station,” said Lee.  “The U.S. lifesaving service is one of the organizations, which eventually formed the modern Coast Guard.”</p>
<p>Richard Etheridge was born a slave to John Etheridge, but was treated almost as well as Etheridge’s white children, learning to read and write beside them.  This gave rise to the belief that Richard Etheridge was the illegitimate son of John Etheridge, althrough it was never confirmed.</p>
<p>During the Civil War, Union troops landed on the Outer Banks and Etheridge enlisted in the Black Regiments and fought with bravery.  Etheridge continued to serve after the war when he enlisted with the Buffalo Soldiers, earning the rank of Regimental Commissary Sergeant before departing the military.  On his return home, Etheridge was given land to live on by John Etheridge and took a part-time job in 1875 at the Pea Island Lifesaving Station.  After a series of disastrous blunders, the United States Lifesaving Service dismissed the station keeper.  Etheridge’s name came up as the best prospect while the USLS was searching for a replacement.</p>
<p>“White and black alike pointed to Richard Etheridge as the guy who was the best at what he did,” said Lee. “It was a unique thing at the time, and they appointed him commander of the lifesaving station.”</p>
<p>Due to segregation laws at the time, the service appointed a full black crew to serve under Etheridge at Pea Island.  The crew’s heroism was cemented after the rescue of the crew from the distressed schooner E.SS Newman. With the schooner aground off the Coast of Pea Island during a hurricane in 1896, Richard Etheridge led a crew of 17 African Americans into the history books.</p>
<p>“They couldn’t use the line gun; they couldn’t use the surfboat,” said Lee. “They ended up figuring out they needed to tie two of the surfman together to swim out to the boat in the middle of a hurricane.”</p>
<p>Battling turbulent waters, the crew successfully rescued all nine people from the distressed schooner.</p>
<p>Etheridge held the position of keeper until his death in 1900.</p>
<p>Located on the grounds of the North Carolina Aquarium, the crew of the Coast Guard Cutter Etheridge visited Richard Etheridge’s grave.  Etheridge’s resting place is a simple affair, a white tombstone, laid into the ground, surrounded by his close family.</p>
<p>“As the first crew of the cutter named after him, it is really on us to honor the namesake in different ways,” said Lee.  The crew is honored to have been able to pay their respect at Richard Etheridge’s grave, but what the crew is most proud of is the name boards on the side of the cutter.  The wood came from the fore beams of the Etheridge family farm house.</p>
<p>The Cutter Richard Etheridge is a new ship for the modern Coast Guard.  With a full suite of modern technology, a higher max speed then existing comparable cutters, and a longer endurance, this 153-foot patrol boat will extend the Coast Guard’s mission far into the future, while reaching back and embracing the legacy of Richard Etheridge&#8217;s past.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/813/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BRAMBLE</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/bramble/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/bramble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SOS! = CGC BRAMBLE (WLB-392) is a nationally significant historic U.S. Coast Guard cutter listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Currently located in Port Huron, Michigan, BRAMBLE is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-ft="{&quot;type&quot;:1,&quot;tn&quot;:&quot;K&quot;}">
<a href="http://laesser.org/wp-content/gallery/180-c-class/bramble.jpg" title="BRAMBLE" class="shutterset_singlepic51" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://laesser.org/wp-content/gallery/cache/51__320x240_bramble.jpg" alt="bramble" title="bramble" />
</a>
SOS! = CGC BRAMBLE (WLB-392) is a nationally significant historic U.S. Coast Guard cutter listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Currently located in Port Huron, Michigan, BRAMBLE is one of only three ships left in the U.S. that participated in the Operation Crossroads atom bomb tests at Bikini Atoll after WWII. In summer 1957, BRAMBLE, with her sister ship SPAR and the light icebreaker STORIS, became one of the first ships to circumnavigate North America through the icy Northwest Passage. BRAMBLE retains a significant level of her original design integrity as a historic and very successful ship design of the 1940s. All of these factors make her important to all of us as Americans.</p>
<p>After trying to sell BRAMBLE at an inflated price for over two years, in early October 2012, BRAMBLE’s owner, the Port Huron Museum, broke off all contact with a nonprofit museum group that was seeking to purchase BRAMBLE for preservation and use as a museum ship. A private buyer and entrepreneur with no background or apparent knowledge related to ship operation or ownership offered the museum twice the ship’s realistic value. Rather than transfer this important ship that it received for FREE to another nonprofit at reasonable cost to preserve and respect BRAMBLE’s history, the nonprofit PH Museum administration chose money and profit over preserving a national historic treasure to sell BRAMBLE IN SECRET to the private buyer for a reported $200,000 sale price. This is a major cause for concern for U.S. Coast Guard veterans and others who support BRAMBLE.</p>
<p>There has been no credible information released as to what the buyer intends to do with the ship aside from rumored “cruises around the Great Lakes.” This could require extensive and expensive modifications that will negatively impact BRAMBLE’s physical and historic integrity and could see her delisted from the National Register. There is no indication she will be used as a museum as her original donation intended. Other details indicate this sale is ill-conceived. The Museum director even concedes that even as the transaction proceeds, the buyer does not even have a mooring location for the ship. No one outside the transaction knows details of what is intended for BRAMBLE and no one knows whether the potential buyer understands and is committed to what will be necessary to preserve BRAMBLE’s integrity, so no one knows whether the Museum administration has made a wise choice in selecting this buyer.</p>
<p>BRAMBLE, as a national treasure, should have been transferred at a reasonable cost by the Port Huron Museum to another nonprofit with the ship’s preservation at professional standards a first priority. BRAMBLE, as a national treasure, should not belong to a single owner who has no accountability or requirement to maintain the ship’s historic designation or integrity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/614/248/117/preserve-the-historic-uscgc-bramble/" rel="nofollow nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.thepetitionsite.com/614/248/117/preserve-the-historic-uscgc-bramble/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/bramble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Court Martial</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/first-court-martial/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/first-court-martial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first charges preferred against any officer in the U. S. Revenue Marine, one predecessor of the Coast Guard, occurred on board the RC Massachusetts on 7 December 1793. The offender, a Third Mate (Lieutenant),]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first charges preferred against any officer in the U. S. Revenue Marine, one predecessor of the Coast Guard, occurred on board the RC Massachusetts on 7 December 1793. The offender, a Third Mate (Lieutenant), was summarily dismissed from the service for speaking disrespectfully of his superior officers in company, insulting Master (Captain) John Foster Williams on board, and before bad example to the men, by ordering them to bring women on board at night and carrying them ashore in the morning, and for writing an order in the name of the Commanding Officer.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/first-court-martial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;First Captains&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/first-captains/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/first-captains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1832, there were eighteen vessels and ninety-two officers in the Revenue Cutter Service. The Service no longer recognized the titles of “Masters and Mates,” but adopted the Naval Ranking system. Commissions were issued containing the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1832, there were eighteen vessels and ninety-two officers in the Revenue Cutter Service. The Service no longer recognized the titles of “Masters and Mates,” but adopted the Naval Ranking system. Commissions were issued containing the specific ranks of Captain and First, Second, and Third Lieutenants. There were also appointments as Warrant Officers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/first-captains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Prayers and Thoughts to the Family</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/our-prayers-and-thoughts-to-the-family/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/our-prayers-and-thoughts-to-the-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is with deep regret and sadness that I report the loss of Chief Boatswain’s Mate Terrell Horne, the Executive Petty Officer of CGC HALIBUT, who died early this morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is with deep regret and sadness that I report the loss of Chief Boatswain’s Mate Terrell Horne, the Executive Petty Officer of CGC HALIBUT, who died early this morning from injuries sustained while conducting maritime law enforcement operations off the California coast.</p>
<p>CGC HALIBUT was investigating a panga-type vessel suspected of illicit activities after it was detected by a Coast Guard maritime patrol aircraft. When the CGC HALIBUT small boat approached, the suspect panga-type vessel maneuvered at a high rate of speed directly towards the small boat and struck it before fleeing the scene. Two Coast Guardsmen were thrown from the boat into the water, and both members were immediately recovered by the small boat. Upon recovery it was apparent that BMC Horne sustained a traumatic head injury. The other crew member had minor injuries. The CGC HALIBUT crew quickly recovered the small boat and boarding team and immediately administered first aid. CGC HALIBUT returned to port where emergency medical service units pronounced BMC Horne deceased.</p>
<p>Coast Guard assets later successfully interdicted the fleeing panga-type vessel, boarded it, and detained two suspects. I commend the Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection units who continued the pursuit and apprehended those believed to be responsible. We are actively investigating the incident.</p>
<p>BMC Horne stood the watch on the front lines of Coast Guard operations throughout his nearly 14 years of active duty. He previously served at Coast Guard Stations Emerald Isle, Humboldt Bay and Charleston, and also sailed aboard the CGC DALLAS. Throughout his Coast Guard service, BMC Horne’s professionalism and commitment, like those before him, ensured that we were always ready to answer the nation’s call.</p>
<p>The entire service is energized to support the family and shipmates of BMC Horne. Please keep his family and the crew of CGC HALIBUT in your thoughts and prayers.</p>
<p>Semper Paratus.<br />
ADM Bob Papp, Commandant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/our-prayers-and-thoughts-to-the-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Revenue Marine Court Martial – 1793</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/first-revenue-marine-court-martial-1793/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/first-revenue-marine-court-martial-1793/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first charges preferred against any officer in the U. S. Revenue Marine, one predecessor of the Coast Guard, occurred on board the RC Massachusetts on 7 December 1793. The offender, a Third Mate (Lieutenant),]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first charges preferred against any officer in the U. S. Revenue Marine, one predecessor of the Coast Guard, occurred on board the RC Massachusetts on 7 December 1793. The offender, a Third Mate (Lieutenant), was summarily dismissed from the service for speaking disrespectfully of his superior officers in company, insulting Master (Captain) John Foster Williams on board, and before bad example to the men, by ordering them to bring women on board at night and carrying them ashore in the morning, and for writing an order in the name of the Commanding Officer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/first-revenue-marine-court-martial-1793/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did You Know…?</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/did-you-know/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/did-you-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureau of marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine inspection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Marine Inspection and Navigation which became part of the Coast Guardin 1942 (for the duration of WWII, and permanently in 1946), really had its beginning, or at]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://laesser.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/marine-boiler.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-755" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: 1px solid black;" title="marine boiler" src="http://laesser.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/marine-boiler.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="117" /></a>The Bureau of Marine Inspection and Navigation which became part of the Coast Guardin 1942 (for the duration of WWII, and permanently in 1946), really had its beginning, or at least its inception, in 1824, when, as a result of the increasing number of lives lost in steamboat disasters,  the Congress directed the Secretary of the Treasury to conduct an investigation of the causes.</p>
<p>When steam boilers first came into general use in vessels, more blew up than ran, notwithstanding that they carried a pressure of not much more than thirty pounds. When, however, it is considered that these boilers were built square and used sea water, the wonder is that they all did not explode.</p>
<p>The result of the investigation by Secretary William H. Crawford was embodied in a report to Henry Clay in which the Secretary said: “In answering this, a resolution of the House of Representatives directed to the Secretary of the Treasury to report to the House the causes of the fatal disasters of steamboats, I have the honor to submit the [i]nclosed correspondence collected on the subject, and I am of the opinion that legislative enactment is calculated to do mischief rather than prevent disasters.” It would be another fourteen years and the major loss of the SS Pulaski and over 200 souls, many prominent members of upper-class U.S. society that Congress finally enacted the Steamboat Inspection Act of 1838 – “to provide for the better security of the lives of passengers on board steam-vessels.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/did-you-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue Cutter Service vs Revenue  Marine</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/revenue-cutter-service-vs-revenue-marine/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/revenue-cutter-service-vs-revenue-marine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confusion abounds. The original fleet of boats is called the Revenue Cutter Service by some, the Revenue Marine by others. In reality, the original fleet of 10 boats suggested by Alexander Hamilton had no]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confusion abounds. The original fleet of boats is called the Revenue Cutter Service by some, the Revenue Marine by others. In reality, the original fleet of 10 boats suggested by Alexander Hamilton had no identifying name. It was merely the fleet of 10 boats that patrolled the Eastern seaboard to prevent smuggling. It is ironic that the colonials who had become expert smugglers to thwart the King, suddenly became criminals for doing the same thing after independence.</p>
<p>It was not until 1837 that the name Revenue Cutter Service appeared in any Acts of Congress, although the phrase “revenue cutters” does appear in a letter of November 29, 1808 from Treasury Secretary Gallatin. The first mention of Revenue Marine did not appear in law until a generations later.</p>
<p>The two terms are not synonymous. The Revenue Cutter Service included the boats, officers and crews. Their job was out at sea. The Revenue Marine was the land based, administrative arm of the Treasury Department created to provide shore support for the Revenue Cutter Service. The Revenue Cutter Service was “operations”. The Revenue Marine was “headquarters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/revenue-cutter-service-vs-revenue-marine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the New York Times (1861)</title>
		<link>http://laesser.org/from-the-new-york-times-1861/</link>
		<comments>http://laesser.org/from-the-new-york-times-1861/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin_ken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laesser.org/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BROOKLYN, Thursday, Jan. 10, 1861. To the Editor of the New-York Times: There is considerable hue-and-cry in the papers about there not being any available vessels of light draft, which]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BROOKLYN, Thursday, Jan. 10, 1861.</p>
<p>To the Editor of the New-York Times:</p>
<p>There is considerable hue-and-cry in the papers about there not being any available vessels of light draft, which the President could order to Charleston should he desire to do so. This is unnecessary, as there are no less than eight Revenue cutters, as you will see by the following list, scattered along the coast from Norfolk, Va., to Eastport, Me. These vessels range from 150 to 600 tons, none of them drawing over ten feet, and if manned and equipped as the Revenue act of 1799 allows, would be able to render good service when called upon.<span id="more-730"></span> The law referred to gives each of these vessels &#8220;seventy men, including non-commissioned officers and marines,&#8221; but at present none of them, except the Harriet Lane, which has her war complement on board, has more than fifteen or twenty seamen attached. There would be no difficulty in getting full crews for the whole of them, if Government desired it, as there are at present plenty of seamen unemployed. If these cutters were fully armed and manned, the Government would have at its command eigth handy vessels, of light draft, carrying about twenty-five guns and five hundred and sixty men. This is a force of no ordinary account in these squally times, and there is no reason why the vessels should not be ordered to the Brooklyn Navy-yard to fit out at once. All the additional armament needed could there be obtained, while any repairs could, also be hastily done at the same place. Even if they should not be needed immediately, there would be no harm done to have them armed and manned as the law says they shall be.</p>
<p>In 1832, Gen. JACKSON sent a fleet of eight or nine Revenue cutters to Charleston, and employed them against the Nullifiers with good effect Why should they not be used now, as they were then? Had the cutter Wm. Aiken; at Charleston, been armed and manned as the law says the Lieutenants could have made resistance against her traitorous Captain and the rebels who assisted him, placed her under the protection of Major ANDERSON&#8217;s guns at Fort Sumter, and saved the United States the disgrace of having had its &#8220;armed cruisers&#8221; captured by the revolutionists. The seizure, as the papers say, of the Revenue cutter J.C. Dobbin, by a few gentlemen of Savannah, is further reason why all the vessels in the Revenue Cutter Service ought to be armed and manned as the law directs. In a fewdays, it is reasonable to suppose, the United States will be still further humiliated by the seizure of the Revenue cutters at Key West, Mobile, New-Orleans and Galveston, for they are armed and manned the same as the others. It is a bad economy, to reduce the armament and crews of Government vessels to seventeen men, including officers, when the law permits them to have seventy &#8212; thereby rendering them defenceless against the attack of a &#8220;few gentlemen.&#8221; No delay should be permitted in putting the Revenue cutters in condition for service, so that the officers would have time to exercise the men at the guns, before being called upon for active duty.</p>
<p>The following is a list of the eight revenue cutters referred to above; they are all schooner-rigged, except the Harriet Lane, which is a steamer:</p>
<p>Duane, Capt. EVANS, stationed at Norfolk, Va. &#8212; is a new vessel.</p>
<p>Philip Allen, Capt. SANDS, stationed at Baltimore, Md., &#8212; is almost a new vessel.</p>
<p>Forward, Capt. NONES, stationed at Wilmington, Del., &#8212; carries two guns. The Forward, under her gallant Captain, saw active service during the Mexican war &#8212; having participated at the bombardment of Tobasco.</p>
<p>Harriet Lane, Capt. FAUNCE, stationed at New-York &#8212; is a new ship, propelled by steam, carries four twenty-four-pound Dahlgreen guns in the waist, with a long thirty-two-pound pivot gun forward, in addition to a small howitzer on the forecastle. This cutter, under her present Captain, was one of the most efficient vessels of the late Paraguay expedition.</p>
<p>James Campbell, Capt. CLARKE, stationed at New-London, Conn., &#8212; nearly new. carries one thirty-two-pound pivot-gun, and is pierced for four waist-guns.</p>
<p>Morris, Capt. WHITCOMB, stationed at Boston,&#8211; carries two twelve-pound guns; is an old vessel. Upon the call of humanity, a few years since, the Morris sailed in search of the ill-fated San Francisco, but after reaching Bermuda and not hearing anything of the object of his search, Capt. WHITOOMB returned.</p>
<p>Caleb Cushing, Capt WALDEN, stationed at Portland, Me., &#8212; hull in good condition; carries only one twelve pound gun, but is pierced for four waist-guns and could carry a thirty-two-pound pivot-gun. Capt WALDEN did good service during the Mexican war, in command of the old Morris, cruising in the Gulf.</p>
<p>Jackson, Lieutenant-Commanding HYDE, stationed at Eastport, Me., &#8212; carries two twelve-pound guns; has a good hull, and glories in a good name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laesser.org/from-the-new-york-times-1861/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
